| This was one of the boldest
strategic decisions in history. Convinced that Hitler could not
invade Britain while the Royal Navy and its protecting Royal Air
Force remained intact, he dispatched the army to a remote
theater of war to open a second front against the Nazi alliance.
Its victories against Mussolini during 1940-41 both humiliated
and infuriated Hitler, while its intervention in Greece, to
oppose Hitler's invasion of the Balkans, disrupted the Nazi
dictator's plans to conclude German conquests in Europe by
defeating Russia.
Churchill's tendency to conduct strategy by impulse
infuriated his advisers. His chief of staff Alan Brooke
complained that every day Churchill had 10 ideas, only one of
which was good — and he did not know which one. Yet Churchill
the romantic showed acute realism in his reaction to Russia's
predicament. He reviled communism. Required to accept a
communist ally in a struggle against a Nazi enemy, he did so not
only willingly but generously. He sent a large proportion of
Britain's war production to Russia by Arctic convoys, even at a
time when the convoys from America to Britain, which alone
spared the country starvation, suffered devastating U-boat
attacks.
From the outset of his premiership, Churchill, half American
by birth, had rested his hope of ultimate victory in U.S.
intervention. He had established a personal relationship with
President Roosevelt that he hoped would flower into a
war-winning alliance. Roosevelt's reluctance to commit the U.S.
beyond an association "short of war" did not dent his optimism.
He always hoped events would work his way. The decision by
Japan, Hitler's ally, to attack the American Pacific fleet at
Pearl Harbor on Dec. 7, 1941, justified his hopes. That evening
he confided to himself, "So we had won after all."
America's entry into the Second World War marked the high
point of Churchill's statesmanship. Britain, demographically,
industrially and financially, had entered the war weaker than
either of its eventual allies, the Soviet Union and the U.S.
Defeats in 1940 had weakened it further, as had the liquidation
of its international investments to fund its early war efforts.
During 1942, the prestige Britain had won as Hitler's only enemy
allowed Churchill to sustain parity of leadership in the
anti-Nazi alliance with Roosevelt and Stalin.
Churchill understandably exulted in the success of the D-day
invasion when it came in 1944. By then it was the Russo-American
rather than the Anglo-American nexus, however, that dominated
the alliance, as he ruefully recognized at the last Big Three
conference in February 1945. Shortly afterward he suffered the
domestic humiliation of losing the general election and with it
the premiership. He was to return to power in 1951 and remain
until April 1955, when ill health and visibly failing powers
caused him to resign.
It would have been kinder to his reputation had he not
returned. He was not an effective peacetime Prime Minister. His
name had been made, and he stood unchallengeable, as the
greatest of all Britain's war leaders. It was not only his own
country, though, that owed him a debt. So too did the world of
free men and women to whom he had made a constant and inclusive
appeal in his magnificent speeches from embattled Britain in
1940 and 1941. Churchill did not merely hate tyranny, he
despised it. The contempt he breathed for dictators — renewed in
his Iron Curtain speech at Fulton, Mo., at the outset of the
cold war — strengthened the West's faith in the moral
superiority of democracy and the inevitability of its triumph.
Historian John Keegan is the defense and military
specialist for London's Daily Telegraph. |